Can Big Data Visualizations be Actionable?

A post in the Harvard Business Review asks this in relation to data generated by the browser logs of a New York Times article and twitter feeds which link to the same article. The result of this study is a platform for visualizing and cross-referencing these two data-streams. The author, Sinan Aral, professor at MIT and Scholar-In-Residence at the NYTimes R&D Lab discusses the work:

We’re doing this to understand and predict when an online cascade or conversation will result in a tidal wave of content consumption on the Times, and also when it won’t. More importantly we are interested in how the word-of-mouth conversation drives readership, subscriptions, and ad revenue; how the Times can improve their own participation in the conversation to drive engagement; how we can identify truly influential readers who themselves drive engagement; and how the Times can then engage these influential users in a way that complements the users’ own needs and interests. Do it, and we can turn that statistical analysis, as you’ll see below, into elegant, artistic real time data streams.

These visualizations, elegant and useful as the are, do not seem to go beyond the tracing of the complex network of agency between nytimes content and their related twitter feeds. What are the next steps in making the visualizations actionable in and of themselves? – i.e. to go beyond providing “decision-relevant information” and actually serve as a point of interface into these unfolding interactions. In other words, how can a platform like this imbed itself directly into the ecology of twitter feeds and nytimes content, becoming the third actor or point of interface in this ecology, not only tracing but also redirecting and deflecting the events in realtime?

Perhaps when dealing in the digital realm alone, this Big Data triumvirate: content producer + social network + data visualizer – is sufficient to close the loop, but I suspect, when dealing with domains that traverse the boundary from digital to physical (and back again), more complex systems of relationships and interface are needed. Here, the visualization must become the content, the content must provide the venue for  social networks to emerge, and these social networks serve as the manpower for more content, etc. Rethinking content as physical could include anything from a building, a farmers market, a bus stop, a share vehicle, an alternate forms of production and retail, and so on.

These visualizations are an outgrowth of the Cascade Project, also by the NYTimes R&D Lab.

Situated Technologies Reading

Week 1 Reading

Situated Technologies Pamphlet Series #3:

Suspicious Images : Latent Interfaces

by Benjamin Bratton & Natalie Jeremijenko

(Section 1 of the Pamphlet, Pages 1 – 53)

download the pdf here

We will discuss this reading on Friday, August 30


“You can’t walk through a design graduate program anywhere in the first world, whether in architecture, interaction design, or media arts, without seeing at least half a dozen beautiful “data smog” projects modeling ambient urban-environmental information in one way or another… There is something great about this, but also something troubling. The danger is that in their spectacularization of information, they in fact distance people…even further from their abilities and responsibilities to understand relationships between the multiple ecologies in which they live, and the possibilities for action that they have… They produce the effect of a “missing expert,” the implicit presumption that somewhere along the line, whether inside a mountain in Wyoming, at the EPA, or through an activist on her bicycle, somewhere someone must be using this interface to actually modulate these things. In this they further distance people from their own ability to look, hypothesize, and act. But in their own way, they are projective images of a parliament of the material public that doesn’t exist yet. The question is…do they provoke the possible emergence of this new form of political engagement, or do they provide an alibi for it never happening because they make it appear that the parliament is already there?”

natalie jeremijenko/NYU environmental health clinic:

benjamin bratton: